David Sanders v. Shawn Spohn
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
July 15, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
158789 (64) David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra DAVID R. SANDERS and HEATHER H. Richard H. Bernstein SANDERS, Elizabeth T. Clement Plaintiffs-Appellees, Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices
v SC: 158789 COA: 338937 Montmorency CC: 16-003949-NO TUMBLEWEED SALOON, INC., and PAINTER INVESTMENTS, INC., d/b/a CHAUNCEY’S PUB, Defendants-Appellants, and SHAWN SPOHN and ZACHARY PIERCE, Defendants.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s May 22, 2020 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. July 15, 2020 p0715 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
David Sanders v. Shawn Spohn (David Sanders v. Shawn Spohn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.