David Sanchez, Jr. v. Marie Vargo
This text of 597 F. App'x 201 (David Sanchez, Jr. v. Marie Vargo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
David Sanchez, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. Sanchez was convicted in 1999 of capital murder and related offenses and is serving a sentence of life plus eighteen years without the possibility of parole. The sole issue raised in this appeal is whether Sanchez is entitled to retroactive application of Miller v. Alabama, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012). In Miller, the Supreme Court held that the Eighth Amendment prohibits a mandatory sentence of life without parole for an offender who was under the age of eighteen at the time of the offense. Id. at 2461. Sanchez was seventeen when he committed the relevant crimes.
This case is governed by our recent decision in Johnson v. Ponton, 780 F.3d 219, 2015 WL 924049 (4th Cir.2015). In Johnson, we held “that the Miller rule is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review.” Id. at 221, 2015 WL 924049 at *1. In light of Miller, we affirm the denial of Sanchez’s § 2254 petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
597 F. App'x 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-sanchez-jr-v-marie-vargo-ca4-2015.