David Rogers v. Gregorio "Greg" Casar
This text of David Rogers v. Gregorio "Greg" Casar (David Rogers v. Gregorio "Greg" Casar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 03-15-00505-CV 6918209 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/14/2015 4:34:37 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE CLERK NO. 03-15-00505-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FILED IN FOR THE THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AT AUSTIN AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/14/2015 4:34:37 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE LAURA PRESSLEY, Clerk
APPELLANT
VS.
GREGORIO “GREG” CASAR,
APPELLEE
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR CONSOLIDATION & CLARIFICATION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE
TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:
Now comes David Rogers, Appellant and moves this court to consolidate
the following cases: 03-15-00368-CV Laura Pressley v. Gregorio “Greg” Casar
and 03-15-00505-CV Laura Pressley v. Gregorio “Greg” Casar. The two cases
are appropriate for consolidation for the following reasons:
1. The two cases involve common questions of fact because both arise from
the same factual situation; namely, the election for the office of Austin City
Council, District 4 held on December 16, 2014 and canvassed on December 30,
2014. In addition, both cases appeal judgments from Travis County District Court
case D-1-GN-15-000374. The first appeal involves a judgment against Pressley
in the election contest, subsequently amended to include a later judgment for
sanctions against Pressley. The second appeals involves a judgment for
sanctions against Pressley’s counsel 2. Under Texas Election Code 232.015, the Court of Appeals MAY
accelerate the appeal in a contest of a general election. 03-15-00368-CV has
been denominated as an accelerated appeal by Appellant, but no order from this
Court or the trial court has been issued denominating that appeal or this appeal
or the trial as accelerated. We therefore seek clarification of the schedule, and
an order entered based on normal application of rules.
3. Judicial convenience and economy will be promoted by consolidation of
the actions. Consolidation will result in one appeal. This will save time and avoid
unnecessary costs and duplication of effort for the Appellants, the Appellees, and
this Court.
PRAYER
For these reasons, David Rogers requests that this court grant his motion
for consolidation and clarification of the scheduling order.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ David Rogers___ David Rogers SBN: 24014089 1201 Spyglass Drive, Suite 100 Austin, Texas 78746 (512) 923-1836 (512) 201-4082 firm@darogerslaw.com
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
Please be advised that the undersigned has conferred with opposing counsel on September 14, 2015 regarding this motion, and the parties are unopposed. __/s/ David Rogers_____________ David Rogers
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing has been served by efile and/or facsimile to the following persons on this 14th day of September 2015.
Mark Cohen SBN: 04508400 805 W. 10th Street, Suite 100 Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 474-4424 (512) 472-5444 fax mark@cohenlegalservices.com
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT LAURA PRESSLEY
Kurt Kuhn SBN: 24002433 KUHN HOBBS PLLC 3307 Northland Drive, # 310 Austin, Texas 78731 (512) 476-6000 (512) 476-6002 fax kurt@KuhnHobbs.com
Charles ‘Chuck’ Herring, Jr. SBN: 09534100 Herring & Irwin, L.L.P 1411 West Avenue, Suite 100 Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 320-0665 (512) 519-7580 fax cherring@herring-irwin.com
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE GREGORIO “GREG” CASAR
__/s/ David Rogers_____________ David Rogers
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David Rogers v. Gregorio "Greg" Casar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-rogers-v-gregorio-greg-casar-texapp-2015.