David Rodriguez v. the Malaise Law Firm, Individually, Stephen Cennamo, Individually and as Employee of the Malaise Law Firm, and John Amos Longoria, Sr., Individually
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00596-CV
David RODRIGUEZ, Appellant
v.
THE MALAISE LAW FIRM, Individually, Stephen Cennamo, Individually and as Employee of The Malaise Law Firm, and John Amos Longoria, Sr., Individually, Appellees
From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012-CI-11758 Honorable Victor Hugo Negron Jr., Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: October 31, 2012
DISMISSED
Pro se appellant David Rodriguez filed a notice of appeal and an affidavit of indigence
with this court. On September 28, 2012, we abated this appeal to the trial court to allow a
contest to appellant’s affidavit of indigence. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1; Higgins v. Randall Cnty.
Sheriff’s Office, 257 S.W.3d 684, 688 (Tex. 2008). On October 19, 2012, appellant filed a
motion to dismiss the appeal; the motion included a certificate of service on appellees. To date,
appellees have not filed any objection to appellant’s motion. 04-12-00596-CV
Therefore, we withdraw our September 28, 2012 order abating this appeal. We reinstate
this appeal on this court’s docket, grant appellant’s motion, and dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Costs of this appeal are taxed against appellant. See id. R. 42.1(d).
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
David Rodriguez v. the Malaise Law Firm, Individually, Stephen Cennamo, Individually and as Employee of the Malaise Law Firm, and John Amos Longoria, Sr., Individually (David Rodriguez v. the Malaise Law Firm, Individually, Stephen Cennamo, Individually and as Employee of the Malaise Law Firm, and John Amos Longoria, Sr., Individually) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.