David Rodriguez, Jr. v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 2, 2022
Docket03-22-00092-CR
StatusPublished

This text of David Rodriguez, Jr. v. the State of Texas (David Rodriguez, Jr. v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David Rodriguez, Jr. v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00092-CR

David Rodriguez, Jr., Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY NO. CR26,673, THE HONORABLE JOHN YOUNGBLOOD, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

After the State indicted David Rodriguez, Jr. for the first-degree felony offense of

murder, he entered an open plea of guilty to the lesser-included offense of second-degree

manslaughter. See Tex. Penal Code § 19.04. On November 18, 2021, the trial court sentenced

Rodriguez to eighteen years’ imprisonment and certified that Rodriguez had the right to appeal

as to “sentencing.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

A defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is

imposed, or within ninety days after sentence is imposed if the defendant has timely filed a

motion for new trial. See id. R. 26.2(a). The time for filing a notice of appeal may be extended

if, within fifteen days of the deadline for filing the notice of appeal, a defendant files a notice of

appeal and a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal. See id. R. 26.3. A notice

of appeal complying with the requirements of Rule 26 is required to vest a court of appeals with

jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). We lack jurisdiction to address the merits of an appeal when an appeal is not timely perfected, and in such

circumstances, we must dismiss the appeal. See id.

Here, Rodriguez was sentenced on November 18, 2021, but he did not file a

motion for new trial and did not mail his pro se notice of appeal for filing in this Court until

February 16, 2022. Thus, his appeal is untimely. See id. R. 26.2(a)(1). We dismiss the appeal

for want of jurisdiction. See id. R. 43.2(f).

__________________________________________ Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: June 2, 2022

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
David Rodriguez, Jr. v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-rodriguez-jr-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.