David Rodriguez, Jr. v. the State of Texas
This text of David Rodriguez, Jr. v. the State of Texas (David Rodriguez, Jr. v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-22-00092-CR
David Rodriguez, Jr., Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY NO. CR26,673, THE HONORABLE JOHN YOUNGBLOOD, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
After the State indicted David Rodriguez, Jr. for the first-degree felony offense of
murder, he entered an open plea of guilty to the lesser-included offense of second-degree
manslaughter. See Tex. Penal Code § 19.04. On November 18, 2021, the trial court sentenced
Rodriguez to eighteen years’ imprisonment and certified that Rodriguez had the right to appeal
as to “sentencing.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).
A defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is
imposed, or within ninety days after sentence is imposed if the defendant has timely filed a
motion for new trial. See id. R. 26.2(a). The time for filing a notice of appeal may be extended
if, within fifteen days of the deadline for filing the notice of appeal, a defendant files a notice of
appeal and a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal. See id. R. 26.3. A notice
of appeal complying with the requirements of Rule 26 is required to vest a court of appeals with
jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). We lack jurisdiction to address the merits of an appeal when an appeal is not timely perfected, and in such
circumstances, we must dismiss the appeal. See id.
Here, Rodriguez was sentenced on November 18, 2021, but he did not file a
motion for new trial and did not mail his pro se notice of appeal for filing in this Court until
February 16, 2022. Thus, his appeal is untimely. See id. R. 26.2(a)(1). We dismiss the appeal
for want of jurisdiction. See id. R. 43.2(f).
__________________________________________ Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: June 2, 2022
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David Rodriguez, Jr. v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-rodriguez-jr-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.