David Rhodes v. United States

207 F.2d 95
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 30, 1953
Docket14407_1
StatusPublished

This text of 207 F.2d 95 (David Rhodes v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David Rhodes v. United States, 207 F.2d 95 (5th Cir. 1953).

Opinion

207 F.2d 95

David RHODES, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 14407.

United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit.

July 10, 1953.
Rehearing Denied Aug. 6, 1953.
Writ of Certiorari DeniedNov. 30, 1953.
See 74 S.Ct. 233.

M. B. Grace, Birmingham, Ala., for appellant.

Russell Chapin, Atty., Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., John D. Hill, U.S. Atty., William L. Hogue, Asst. U.S. Atty., Birmingham, Ala., Joseph D. Guilfoyle, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., D. Vance Swann, Atty., Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The same questions here involved were determined in the companion case of Horton v. United States, 5 Cir., 207 F.2d 91, this day decided upon the authority of which the judgment appealed from is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horton v. United States
207 F.2d 91 (Fifth Circuit, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
207 F.2d 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-rhodes-v-united-states-ca5-1953.