David Reed v. Asphalt Managment, Inc. and Stephen Jenkins
This text of David Reed v. Asphalt Managment, Inc. and Stephen Jenkins (David Reed v. Asphalt Managment, Inc. and Stephen Jenkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued February 9, 2017
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00842-CV ——————————— DAVID REED, Appellant V. ASPHALT MANAGEMENT, INC. AND STEPHEN JENKINS, Appellees
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1065003
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, David Reed, has neither established indigence for purposes of
appellate costs nor made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record.
See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.3(b), (c).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any
pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Bland.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David Reed v. Asphalt Managment, Inc. and Stephen Jenkins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-reed-v-asphalt-managment-inc-and-stephen-jenkins-texapp-2017.