David Ray Hayes v. State
This text of David Ray Hayes v. State (David Ray Hayes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ September 14, 2016
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A17D0064. DAVID RAY HAYES v. THE STATE.
In October 2015, David Ray Hayes was convicted of aggravated assault and
possession of a knife during the commission of a crime, for which he was sentenced
to 25 years, with 7 years to serve in confinement. In July 2016, Hayes filed a motion
for sentence modification. The trial court denied the motion on July 29, 2016, and
Hayes filed this application for discretionary appeal on September 2, 2016.
A sentencing court may modify a sentence within one year of its imposition or
within 120 days after remittitur following a direct appeal, whichever is later. See
OCGA § 17-10-1 (f). The denial of a timely motion to modify a sentence under
OCGA § 17-10-1 (f) may be appealed directly. See, e. g., Anderson v. State, 290 Ga.
App. 890 (660 SE2d 876) (2008); Maldonado v. State, 260 Ga. App. 580 (580 SE2d
330) (2003).
Ordinarily, when a party applies for discretionary review of a directly
appealable order, we grant the application under OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). To fall within
this general rule, however, the application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the
order or judgment to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d); Hill v State, 204 Ga. App.
582, 583 (420 SE2d 393) (1992). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in
compliance therewith. See Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57)
(1989). Here, Hayes filed his application 35 days after the trial court’s order was
entered. Accordingly, the application is untimely, and it is hereby DISMISSED for
lack of jurisdiction.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 09/14/2016 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David Ray Hayes v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-ray-hayes-v-state-gactapp-2016.