David Pete and Cecile Pete v. Community Bank of Texas, NA and Alan Cramer Investments, Inc.
This text of David Pete and Cecile Pete v. Community Bank of Texas, NA and Alan Cramer Investments, Inc. (David Pete and Cecile Pete v. Community Bank of Texas, NA and Alan Cramer Investments, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-25-00270-CV __________________
DAVID PETE AND CECILE PETE, Appellants
V.
COMMUNITY BANK OF TEXAS, NA AND ALAN CRAMER INVESTMENTS, INC., Appellees
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 136th District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. D-201391 __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On July 18, 2025, Appellants David Pete and Cecile Pete filed a notice of
appeal from a judgment signed on July 17, 2025, from the 136th District Court of
Jefferson County, Texas. Upon receiving the notice of appeal from Appellants, the
Clerk of the Court issued an Invoice for the filing fee for the appeal. By letter dated
August 19, 2025, we notified the parties that Appellants had not paid the filing fee
1 as directed in our letter and Bill of Costs previously forwarded to Appellants. A
Certified Bill of Costs for the filing fee was enclosed and provided to Appellants.
We warned Appellants in our letter, dated August 19, 2025, that unless the
filing fee was paid, the appeal would be dismissed without further notice on any date
after Friday, August 29, 2025. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). As of this date,
Appellants have failed to pay the filing fee as directed by this Court.
Appellants have not paid the filing fee for the appeal. Appellants did not file
a statement of inability to pay costs in this matter and have not shown that they are
entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See id. 20.1. Furthermore, Appellants
failed to comply with a notice from the Clerk of the Court requiring a response within
a specified time. See id. 42.3(c). We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See
id. 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on September 17, 2025 Opinion Delivered September 18, 2025
Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Chambers, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David Pete and Cecile Pete v. Community Bank of Texas, NA and Alan Cramer Investments, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-pete-and-cecile-pete-v-community-bank-of-texas-na-and-alan-cramer-texapp-2025.