David Ohrt, Sandra Hester, and Judy Sinast v. Calpine Corporation

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 8, 2009
Docket13-09-00414-CV
StatusPublished

This text of David Ohrt, Sandra Hester, and Judy Sinast v. Calpine Corporation (David Ohrt, Sandra Hester, and Judy Sinast v. Calpine Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David Ohrt, Sandra Hester, and Judy Sinast v. Calpine Corporation, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion





NUMBER 13-09-00414-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

DAVID OHRT, SANDRA HESTER AND

JUDY SINAST, Appellants,



v.



CALPINE CORPORATION, Appellee.

_____________________________________________________________



On appeal from the 24th District Court

of Victoria County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Benavides, and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



David Ohrt, Sandra Hester, and Judy Sinast, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 24th District Court of Victoria County, Texas, in cause number 01-12-57,427-A (David Ohrt, Sandra Hester, and Judy Sinast, v. Union Gas Corporation, et. al. appellate cause number 13-05-00621-CV). This cause is presently before the Court on appellants' unopposed motion to dismiss Calpine Corporation (Calpine Natural Gas Company) without prejudice.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants' motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). Appellants' motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Costs will be taxed against appellants. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants' request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered

and filed this the 8th day of October, 2009.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
David Ohrt, Sandra Hester, and Judy Sinast v. Calpine Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-ohrt-sandra-hester-and-judy-sinast-v-calpine-texapp-2009.