David Namer v. United States

668 F. App'x 188
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 11, 2016
Docket15-3874
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 668 F. App'x 188 (David Namer v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David Namer v. United States, 668 F. App'x 188 (8th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

*189 PER CURIAM.

Federal prisoner David I. Namer appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in this Federal Tort Claims Act action alleging delay by the Bureau of Prisons in providing him adequate medical care. After careful de novo review, see Beaulieu v. Ludeman, 690 F.3d 1017, 1024 (8th Cir. 2012) (de novo review of grant of summary judgment), we conclude that summary judgment was appropriate for the reasons stated by the district court in its thorough and careful opinion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Joe J. Volpe, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boucher, John v. Martin
W.D. Wisconsin, 2020

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
668 F. App'x 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-namer-v-united-states-ca8-2016.