David Middleton v. Charles Yarborough William Gray

816 F.2d 681, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 5269, 1987 WL 37165
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 22, 1987·No. 86-1945·Unpublished

Opinion

816 F.2d 681

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
David MIDDLETON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Charles YARBOROUGH; William Gray, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 86-1945.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 22, 1987.

Before MARTIN and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, and ALDRICH, District Judge.*

ORDER

Plaintiff filed this civil rights action claiming a denial of sixth and fourteenth amendment rights by officials of the Michigan Training Unit at Ionia. The district court ultimately granted summary judgment for defendants and this appeal followed. On appeal, the parties have briefed the issues.

Upon consideration of the briefs and record, we affirm for the reasons set forth in the order being reviewed. Rule 9(b), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

*

The Honorable Ann Aldrich, U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David Middleton v. Charles Yarborough William Gray, 816 F.2d 681, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 5269, 1987 WL 37165 (6th Cir. 1987).

816 F.2d 681 (David Middleton v. Charles Yarborough William Gray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pasternak v. Sagittarius Recording Co
816 F.2d 681 (Sixth Circuit, 1987)