David Middleton v. Charles Yarborough William Gray
This text of 816 F.2d 681 (David Middleton v. Charles Yarborough William Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
David MIDDLETON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Charles YARBOROUGH; William Gray, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 86-1945.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
April 22, 1987.
Before MARTIN and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, and ALDRICH, District Judge.*
ORDER
Plaintiff filed this civil rights action claiming a denial of sixth and fourteenth amendment rights by officials of the Michigan Training Unit at Ionia. The district court ultimately granted summary judgment for defendants and this appeal followed. On appeal, the parties have briefed the issues.
Upon consideration of the briefs and record, we affirm for the reasons set forth in the order being reviewed. Rule 9(b), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
The Honorable Ann Aldrich, U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
816 F.2d 681, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 5269, 1987 WL 37165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-middleton-v-charles-yarborough-william-gray-ca6-1987.