David Medrano v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, Successor by Merger With Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation, Celine Hinojosa, Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc., D/B/A HOMEQ, as Servicing Agent for Duetsche Bank National Trust Company

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 20, 2015
Docket04-14-00913-CV
StatusPublished

This text of David Medrano v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, Successor by Merger With Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation, Celine Hinojosa, Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc., D/B/A HOMEQ, as Servicing Agent for Duetsche Bank National Trust Company (David Medrano v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, Successor by Merger With Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation, Celine Hinojosa, Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc., D/B/A HOMEQ, as Servicing Agent for Duetsche Bank National Trust Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David Medrano v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, Successor by Merger With Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation, Celine Hinojosa, Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc., D/B/A HOMEQ, as Servicing Agent for Duetsche Bank National Trust Company, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Fidelity National Title Insurance Company,

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 20, 2015

No. 04-14-00913-CV

David MEDRANO, Appellant

v.

FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Successor by Merger Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation, Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc. d.b.a HOMEQ, as servicing Agent for Duetsche Bnk. National Trust Company as Trustee, Appellees

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2008-CI-00027 The Honorable Richard E. Price, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s judgment and an affidavit of indigence. A contest to the affidavit was filed and, on January 26, 2015, the trial court sustained the contest. Medrano did not file a motion challenging the trial court’s order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(j)(1), (2) (party may challenge order sustaining contest by filing motion in court of appeals no later than ten days after order sustaining contest is signed).

Both the court reporter and the district clerk have filed notifications of late record, stating the records have not been filed because appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk’s and reporter’s fees to prepare the record and appellant is not entitled to the record without paying the fees.

We order appellant David Medrano to file, by March 2, 2015, written proof that the clerk’s and reporter’s fees have been paid or arrangements satisfactory to the clerk and reporter have been made to pay the fees. If Medrano fails to timely comply with this order, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 20th day of February, 2015.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
David Medrano v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, Successor by Merger With Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation, Celine Hinojosa, Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc., D/B/A HOMEQ, as Servicing Agent for Duetsche Bank National Trust Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-medrano-v-fidelity-national-title-insurance-company-successor-by-texapp-2015.