David Medrano v. Celine Hinojosa
This text of David Medrano v. Celine Hinojosa (David Medrano v. Celine Hinojosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas JUDGMENT No. 04-14-00913-CV
David MEDRANO, Appellant
v.
Celine HINOJOSA, Appellees
From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2008-CI-00027 The Honorable Richard E. Price, Judge Presiding
BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ
In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, Appellee Celine Hinojosa’s motion to dismiss this appeal is GRANTED IN PART, and DENIED IN PART. It is ORDERED that issues one, two, and six are DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. The judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.
It is ORDERED that Appellee Celine Hinojosa recover her costs on appeal from Appellant David Medrano.
SIGNED June 1, 2016.
___________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David Medrano v. Celine Hinojosa, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-medrano-v-celine-hinojosa-texapp-2016.