David Mcculla, et Ux. v. Brian C. Rell, D.P.M.

140 So. 3d 538, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 364, 2014 WL 2208904, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1739
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 29, 2014·No. SC12-2598·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the Second District Court of Appeal’s decision in Rell v. McCulla, 101 So.3d 878 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this review proceeding.

It is so ordered.

POLSTON, C.J., and LEWIS, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. PARIENTE and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David Mcculla, et Ux. v. Brian C. Rell, D.P.M., 140 So. 3d 538, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 364, 2014 WL 2208904, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1739 (Fla. 2014).

140 So. 3d 538 (David Mcculla, et Ux. v. Brian C. Rell, D.P.M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rell v. McCulla
101 So. 3d 878 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)