David Maurice Beatty v. James Phillip Griffin

74 F.3d 1230, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39019, 1996 WL 15447

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: January 17, 1996
• Docket: 95-7209
• Status: Published

Opinion

74 F.3d 1230
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

David Maurice BEATTY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James Phillip GRIFFIN, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-7209.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 14, 1995.
Decided: January 17, 1996.

David Maurice Beatty, Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Beatty v. Griffin, No. CA-95-234-CT-5-BO (E.D.N.C. July 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The district court's typographical error that Plaintiff, rather than Defendant, was employed by the North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services is of no moment