David Martin Ortiz v. Kaylynn Sylvia
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00052-CV ___________________________
DAVID MARTIN ORTIZ, Appellant
V.
KAYLYNN SYLVIA, Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021-005719-1
Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
Appellant’s brief was due July 6, 2022. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). On July 21,
2022, we notified Appellant that his brief had not been filed as the Texas Rules of
Appellate Procedure require. We stated that we could dismiss his appeal for want of
prosecution unless, within ten days, Appellant filed a brief along with an
accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimeliness. See Tex. R. App.
P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). More than thirty days have passed, but we have not
received a response.
Because Appellant has failed to file a brief, we dismiss his appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam
Delivered: August 31, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
David Martin Ortiz v. Kaylynn Sylvia (David Martin Ortiz v. Kaylynn Sylvia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.