David Malcom Strickland v. State
Opinion
NUMBER 13-16-00701-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
DAVID STRICKLAND, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 36th Judicial District Court of San Patricio County, Texas.
ORDER ABATING APPEAL Before Justices Contreras, Benavides, and Longoria Order Per Curiam
Currently pending before the Court is “Appellant’s Motion to Reverse and Render
Based Upon Insufficient Evidence and to Vacate the Conviction and Seek Immediate
Release” and the response thereto filed by appellee.1 Appellant has requested that this
1 Appellant’s emergency motion to compel the State to file its response under seal is rendered moot by this abatement. Court file the motions under seal based on the sensitive information contained within.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g) (referring to what materials can be sealed in appellate courts).
Due to the nature of the request, we ABATE the appeal and REMAND this matter
to the trial court. We request that the trial court conduct a hearing to ascertain if any of
the information contained within the appellant’s pending motion requires the motion to be
filed under seal with this Court. The trial court shall conduct this hearing within twenty
days from the issuance of this order and make findings in regard to appellant’s request.
The trial court shall then file a supplemental reporter’s and clerk's record containing its
findings. All additional motions will be CARRIED WITH THE CASE pending further order
of the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 15th day of November, 2018.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
David Malcom Strickland v. State (David Malcom Strickland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.