David M. Sepulveda v. State
This text of David M. Sepulveda v. State (David M. Sepulveda v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-10-00239-CR
David M. SEPULVEDA, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2007-CR-4404 Honorable Philip A. Kazen Jr., Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: May 12, 2010
DISMISSED
Appellant David M. Sepulveda pleaded guilty to the offense of aggravated robbery pursuant
to a plea bargain agreement. As part of his plea-bargain, appellant signed a separate “Waiver of
Appeal.” The trial court imposed sentence and signed a certificate stating that this “is a plea-bargain
case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal” and “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.”
See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(a)(2). Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal. The clerk’s record, which 04-10-00239-CR
includes the plea bargain agreement and the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed.
See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d). This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the
defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id.
The court gave appellant notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless an amended trial
court certification showing he has the right to appeal were made part of the appellate record within
thirty days. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.–San
Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet.
ref’d) (not designated for publication). Appellant’s appointed appellate counsel filed a written
response, stating she has reviewed the record and can find no right of appeal. After reviewing the
record and counsel’s notice, we agree appellant does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State,
154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record
to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate). We therefore dismiss this appeal. TEX .
R. APP . P. 25.2(d).
Do Not Publish
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David M. Sepulveda v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-m-sepulveda-v-state-texapp-2010.