David M. Branum v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 24, 2012·No. 02-12-00143-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00143-CR

DAVID M. BRANUM APPELLANT V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 297TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

Appellant David M. Branum attempts to appeal the trial court’s order that voids ab initio the judgment revoking his community supervision. On April 11, 2012, we sent Branum a letter stating our concern that we lacked jurisdiction over the appeal because the order voiding the judgment did not appear to be appealable. See McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

1996, no pet.); see also Saliba v. State, 45 S.W.3d 329, 329 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2001, no pet.). We instructed Branum or any party desiring to continue the appeal to file a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal or the appeal would be dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. Branum filed a response, but it does not show grounds for continuing the appeal. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: May 24, 2012

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David M. Branum v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

David M. Branum v. State (David M. Branum v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Saliba v. State
45 S.W.3d 329 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)
McKown v. State
915 S.W.2d 160 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)