David Lynd v. McDonald's Corp

Fifth Circuit

David Lynd v. McDonald's Corp

420 F. App'x 348

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 28, 2011

Docket10-10503

StatusUnpublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 420 F. App'x 348 (David Lynd v. McDonald's Corp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

David Lynd v. McDonald's Corp, 420 F. App'x 348 (5th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM *

David Lynd moves this court for authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in this appeal from the denial of his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. Lynd asserts that he is impoverished, that his claims are valid, and that the magistrate judge was biased. These allegations are insufficient to show that Lynd will raise a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. See Carson v. Polley, 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir.1982). Consequently, his IFP motion is DENIED and this appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. All other outstanding motions are likewise DENIED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM *

David Lynd moves this court for authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in this appeal from the denial of his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. Lynd asserts that he is impoverished, that his claims are valid, and that the magistrate judge was biased. These allegations are insufficient to show that Lynd will raise a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. See Carson v. Polley, 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir.1982). Consequently, his IFP motion is DENIED and this appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. All other outstanding motions are likewise DENIED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

420 F. App'x 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-lynd-v-mcdonalds-corp-ca5-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack