David Leon O'Hara v. Clarence P. Burford, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
This text of 181 F.2d 96 (David Leon O'Hara v. Clarence P. Burford, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
181 F.2d 96
David Leon O'HARA, Appellant,
v.
Clarence P. BURFORD, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, Appellee.
No. 4019.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
April 11, 1950.
Writ of Certiorari Denied June 5, 1950.
See 70 S.Ct. 1016.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma; Eugene Rice, Judge.
David Leon O'Hara filed a brief pro se.
Mac Q. Williamson, Attorney General of Oklahoma, and Owen J. Watts, Assistant Attorney General of Oklahoma, filed a brief on behalf of appellee.
Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and HUXMAN and PICKETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed on authority of Pete Darr v. C. P. Burford, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, decided April 3, 1950, 70 S.Ct. 587.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
181 F.2d 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-leon-ohara-v-clarence-p-burford-warden-oklah-ca10-1950.