David Len Moulton v. Carrel Byrum, Dean Byrum and Stephanie Moulton, Individually and as an Heir of the Estate of Rebecca Moulton

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 19, 2006
Docket06-06-00076-CV
StatusPublished

This text of David Len Moulton v. Carrel Byrum, Dean Byrum and Stephanie Moulton, Individually and as an Heir of the Estate of Rebecca Moulton (David Len Moulton v. Carrel Byrum, Dean Byrum and Stephanie Moulton, Individually and as an Heir of the Estate of Rebecca Moulton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David Len Moulton v. Carrel Byrum, Dean Byrum and Stephanie Moulton, Individually and as an Heir of the Estate of Rebecca Moulton, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion



In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana


______________________________


No. 06-06-00076-CV



DAVID LEN MOULTON, Appellant

V.

CARREL BYRUM, DEAN BYRUM AND STEPHANIE MOULTON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AN HEIR OF THE ESTATE

OF REBECCA MOULTON, Appellees




On Appeal from the Fifth Judicial District Court

Cass County, Texas

Trial Court No. 04-C-547





Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss



MEMORANDUM OPINION

            David Len Moulton, appellant, filed his notice of appeal July 12, 2006. Moulton has neither filed a docketing statement with this Court, see Tex. R. App. P. 32, nor has he paid a filing fee or made any claim of indigency. There is nothing in the record to indicate Moulton has made efforts to have either the clerk's record or reporter's record filed with this Court, and he has not filed a brief. On August 17, 2006, we contacted Moulton by letter, giving him an opportunity to cure the various defects, and warning him that, if we did not receive an adequate response within ten days, this appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

            We have received no communication from Moulton. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

                                                                                    Josh R. Morriss, III

                                                                                    Chief Justice


Date Submitted:          September 18, 2006

Date Decided:             September 19, 2006

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
David Len Moulton v. Carrel Byrum, Dean Byrum and Stephanie Moulton, Individually and as an Heir of the Estate of Rebecca Moulton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-len-moulton-v-carrel-byrum-dean-byrum-and-st-texapp-2006.