David Lee Raetzsch v. the Honorable Louise Pearson, Clerk
This text of David Lee Raetzsch v. the Honorable Louise Pearson, Clerk (David Lee Raetzsch v. the Honorable Louise Pearson, Clerk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-12-00710-CV
David Lee Raetzsch, Appellant
v.
The Honorable Louise Pearson, Clerk, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 167TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. D-1-DC-12-20038-A, HONORABLE MIKE LYNCH, JUDGE PRESIDING
David Lee Raetzsch filed an application for writ of habeas corpus with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals that was dismissed on May 2, 2012 for noncompliance. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2012). Raetzsch attempts to challenge that dismissal in his notice of appeal filed with this Court.
We lack jurisdiction to review the action taken by the court of criminal appeals. See Tex. Const. art. V, § 5; State ex rel. Wilson v. Briggs, 351 S.W.2d 892, 894 (1961) (recognizing that court of criminal appeals is court of last resort in criminal matters and as such, no other state court has authority to override or circumvent its decisions or disobey its mandates). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
Jeff Rose, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: November 2, 2012
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David Lee Raetzsch v. the Honorable Louise Pearson, Clerk, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-lee-raetzsch-v-the-honorable-louise-pearson--texapp-2012.