David Lawton Petty v. State of Florida
This text of 263 So. 3d 307 (David Lawton Petty v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D18-3686 _____________________________
DAVID LAWTON PETTY,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County. Robert M. Foster, Judge.
March 4, 2019
BILBREY, J.
Appellant, David Lawton Petty, challenges the trial court order finding him in indirect criminal contempt and imposing a ten-day jail sentence. We affirm the order finding him in contempt but reverse for resentencing in accordance with rule 3.840(g), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Rule 3.840(g) requires that prior to the pronouncement of sentence for indirect criminal contempt, the court “inform the defendant of the accusation and judgment,” “inquire as to whether the defendant has any cause to show why sentence should not be pronounced,” and afford the defendant “the opportunity to present evidence of mitigating circumstances.” In addition, the sentence must be pronounced “in open court and in the presence of the defendant.” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.840(g). The trial court did not comply with these requirements, and the failure to comply with rule 3.840(g) is fundamental error. Gooden v. State, 931 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); see also Ensign v. State, 67 So. 3d 353 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).
The order finding Appellant in willful contempt of court is affirmed, but the sentence imposed is reversed pursuant to Gooden. This cause is remanded for resentencing compliant with rule 3.840(g).
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.
ROWE and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. Such a motion must be filed on or before March 7, 2019. In absence of such motion by that date, the Clerk shall issue the mandate thereafter forthwith. Any response to such motion may be filed on or before March 13, 2019. _____________________________
Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Jasmine Russell, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
263 So. 3d 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-lawton-petty-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.