David L. Parrish v. State of Nebraska

17 F. App'x 506
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 4, 2001
Docket01-1260
StatusUnpublished

This text of 17 F. App'x 506 (David L. Parrish v. State of Nebraska) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David L. Parrish v. State of Nebraska, 17 F. App'x 506 (8th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Parrish appeals the district court’s 1 orders dismissing his action based on immunity and lack of jurisdiction, and denying appointment of counsel. Upon de novo review, see Rose v. U.S. Dep’t of Educ., 187 F.3d 926, 928 (8th Cir.1999); Clarinda Home Health v. Shalala, 100 F.3d 526, 528 (8th Cir.1996), we conclude the district court did not err in denying appointment of counsel, and we affirm the dismissal for the reasons stated in the district court’s order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

A true copy.

1

. The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 F. App'x 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-l-parrish-v-state-of-nebraska-ca8-2001.