David L. Glassel v. Seamless Operating Group, LLC Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Chemical Free Solutions, LLC., and Cedar Oil Solutions, LLC
This text of David L. Glassel v. Seamless Operating Group, LLC Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Chemical Free Solutions, LLC., and Cedar Oil Solutions, LLC (David L. Glassel v. Seamless Operating Group, LLC Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Chemical Free Solutions, LLC., and Cedar Oil Solutions, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 14-14-00649-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 1/29/2015 4:53:04 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE CLERK
No. 14-14-00649-CV _________________________________________________________________ FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS In the Court of Appeals HOUSTON, TEXAS for the Fourteenth District of Texas 1/29/2015 4:53:04 PM at Houston CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk __________________________________________________________________
DAVID L. GLASSEL,
Appellant,
v.
SEAMLESS OPERATING GROUP, LLC INDIVIDUALLY AND DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF CHEMICAL FREE SOLUTIONS, LLC, AND CEDAR OIL SOLUTIONS, LLC
Appellees
On Appeal from the 189th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012-41601
APPELLANT DAVID L. GLASSEL’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING OF APPELLANT’S BRIEF
TO THE HONORABLE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS:
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3, Appellant David L.
Glassel files this Motion for Extension of Time to File his Appellant’s Brief, which
complies with Rule 10.5(b), and respectfully shows the Court as follows: 1. This is an appeal from the final order in Cause No. 2012-41601;
Seamless Operating Group, LLC et al v. David L. Glassel et al; In the 189th
Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas.
2. The current deadline for Mr. Glassel’s Appellant’s Brief is Friday,
January 30, 2015.
3. Mr. Glassel was pro se at trial and in this appeal until he was able to
engage the undersigned counsel, who has appeared contemporaneous with the
filing of this motion on January 29, 2015.
4. This is Mr. Glassel’s second request for an extension of time. Mr.
Glassel previously requested a 30-day extension to allow him to engage counsel,
which the Court granted.
5. Mr. Glassel seeks an extension of time until Monday, March 2, 2015,
which would be a 32-day extension, to allow his counsel to review the record and
the law, and to draft a brief that would assist the Court regarding Mr. Glassel’s
issue on appeal. Mr. Glassel was previously unable to secure representation due to
the complexity of the matter on appeal and insufficient funds. The undersigned
counsel does not have sufficient time to properly prepare a brief to the Court
without the requested extension.
6. Mr. Glassel brings this motion pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure 38.6(d) and in compliance with Rule 10.5(b). 2 7. Mr. Glassel does not seek this extension for the purposes of delay but
only so that justice may be service.
PRAYER
For all these reasons, Appellant David L. Glassel respectfully requests a 32-
day extension of time for filing his Appellant’s Brief until Monday, March 2, 2015
and for such further or additional relief to which he may be entitled.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/George F. May/ ________________________________ George F. May TBA No. 24037050 TWOMEY | MAY, PLLC 2 Riverway, 15th Floor Houston, Texas 77056 (713) 659-0000 [Telephone] (832) 201-8485 [Telecopier] gmay@twomeymay.com
Attorneys for Appellant David L. Glassel
3 CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
I, George F. May, counsel for Appellant David L. Glassel, do hereby certify that I have conferred with Appellees’ counsel Travis Vargo regarding Appellant’s second request for extension of time to file his Appellant’s Brief and Mr. Vargo indicated to me that he would confer on the matter but, at the time of this filing, I have not heard from Mr. Vargo so this motion is filed assuming Appellees oppose Appellant’s request.
/s/ George F. May/ George F. May
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
As required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.3 and 9.5(b), (d), (e), I certify that I have served this document on all other parties, which are listed below on January 29, 2015 as follows:
Travis B. Vargo FRIDGE & RESENDEZ LLC 3000 Smith St. Houston, Texas 77006 (713) 226-9100 – Phone (713) 226-9800 – Fax tvargo@frw-law.com
Attorney for Appellees
By (check all that apply) personal delivery mail commercial delivery service X fax, email, or electronic service
4 Date: January 29, 2015
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David L. Glassel v. Seamless Operating Group, LLC Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Chemical Free Solutions, LLC., and Cedar Oil Solutions, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-l-glassel-v-seamless-operating-group-llc-individually-and-texapp-2015.