David L. Adams v. R.S. Peterson, Superintendent of O.S.C.I.

955 F.2d 1311, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1238, 92 Daily Journal DAR 1802, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 1499
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in David L. Adams v. R.S. Peterson, Superintendent of O.S.C.I.. Read the opinion of the Court — 968 F.2d 835
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 5, 1992·No. 87-4191·Published

Opinion

955 F.2d 1311

David L. ADAMS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
R.S. PETERSON, Superintendent of O.S.C.I., Respondent-Appellee.

No. 87-4191.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 5, 1992.

Stephen R. Sady, Chief Deputy Federal Public Defender, Portland, Or., for petitioner-appellant.

Rives Kistler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, Or., for respondent-appellee.

Prior report: 939 F.2d 1369.

Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, BROWNING, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, D.W. NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, RYMER, T.G. NELSON, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David L. Adams v. R.S. Peterson, Superintendent of O.S.C.I., 955 F.2d 1311, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1238, 92 Daily Journal DAR 1802, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 1499 (9th Cir. 1992).

955 F.2d 1311 (David L. Adams v. R.S. Peterson, Superintendent of O.S.C.I.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adams v. Peterson
955 F.2d 1311 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)