David Kirby v. State
This text of David Kirby v. State (David Kirby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion filed December 31, 2015
In The
Eleventh Court of Appeals ____________
No. 11-15-00300-CR ____________
DAVID KIRBY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 244th District Court Ector County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. C-44,870
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, David Kirby, pleaded guilty to the offense of attempted failure to comply with sex offender registration, a state jail felony. The trial court assessed Appellant’s punishment in accordance with the terms of his plea agreement at confinement for nine months in a state jail facility. We dismiss the appeal. This court notified Appellant by a letter dated December 14, 2015, that we had received information from the trial court that Appellant waived his right of appeal in this cause. The trial court certified that Appellant waived his right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2. The trial court’s certification was signed by Appellant, his trial attorney, and the judge of the trial court. We requested that Appellant respond and show grounds to continue the appeal. Appellant’s attorney on appeal has filed a response in which he states that he was not the attorney at trial but that Appellant may have entered into a conditional plea or reserved the right to appeal an adverse ruling on a motion to dismiss. A review of the documents on file in this court reflect otherwise. Rule 25.2(d) provides that an appeal must be dismissed absent a certification that shows that the defendant has a right of appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The trial court certified that Appellant waived the right of appeal. Documents on file in this court reflect that Appellant waived various rights, including his right of appeal. These waivers were signed by Appellant, his trial attorney, and the trial judge. Among the waivers was a “WAIVER OF RIGHT TO APPEAL” in which Appellant affirmatively, “voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently WAIVE[D] [HIS] RIGHT TO APPEAL.” Appellant’s waiver of his right to appeal expressly included “matters raised by written motion filed prior to trial.” The documents on file in this case support the trial court’s certification and show that Appellant waived his right of appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we must dismiss this appeal without further action. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). This appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM December 31, 2015 Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David Kirby v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-kirby-v-state-texapp-2015.