David Keene., Resp. v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.a., App.
This text of David Keene., Resp. v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.a., App. (David Keene., Resp. v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.a., App.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., No. 72002-3-1 Appellant, DIVISION ONE v. UNPUBLISHED OPINION DAVIED KEENE,
Respondent. FILED: DEC 8 - 2014
PER CURIAM - Following the Washington State Supreme Court's decision in
BAC Home Loans Servicing. LP v. Fulbriqht. 180 Wn.2d 754, 328 P.3d 895 (2014), the
parties in this appeal filed a "Stipulation and Motion for Concession of Error." In light of the Supreme Court's decision, the parties "agree the trial court's Order Declaring JPMorgan Chase Bank Has no Right of Redemption Under RCW 6.23.010 should be reversed. The parties further agree that each party shall bear its own fees and costs." We accept the concession of error and reverse and remand for further proceedings. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
FOR THE COURT:
m • •( o o- i CO
CD
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David Keene., Resp. v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.a., App., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-keene-resp-v-jpmorgan-chase-bank-na-app-washctapp-2014.