David Kates v. State of Texas

563 F. App'x 332
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 16, 2014
Docket13-10447
StatusUnpublished

This text of 563 F. App'x 332 (David Kates v. State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David Kates v. State of Texas, 563 F. App'x 332 (5th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

David Kates, federal prisoner # 30428-077, was convicted by a jury of possessing with the intent to distribute cocaine base and was sentenced to 360 months of imprisonment. See United States v. Kates, 174 F.3d 580, 581-84 (5th Cir.1999). On February 8, 2012, in No. 2:12-CV-0018, the district court entered the following order:

DAVID EARL KATES is BARRED FROM FILING FURTHER ACTIONS, MOTIONS, OR PLEADINGS OF ANY KIND ON THE DISTRICT COURT LEVEL WITHOUT FIRST *333 OBTAINING WRITTEN JUDICIAL PERMISSION. Any future pleadings in violation of this BAR will be stricken and will receive no ruling from the Court.

On April 8, 2013, Kates filed a “Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Supervisory Remedial and Extraordinary Writs that are available Pursuant to the All Writs Act 28 U.S.C. [§ ] 1361.” On April 10, 2013, the district court, in accordance with the standing sanctioning order, directed that this pleading “is STRICKEN and will receive no ruling from the Court.” Kates has not shown that this was an abuse of discretion. See Balawajder v. Scott, 160 F.3d 1066, 1067-68 (5th Cir.1998); see also Gelabert v. Lynaugh, 894 F.2d 746, 747-48 (5th Cir.1990).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Balawajder v. Scott
160 F.3d 1066 (Fifth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Kates
174 F.3d 580 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
563 F. App'x 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-kates-v-state-of-texas-ca5-2014.