David Joachim v. Friedman & Feiger, L.L.P.
This text of David Joachim v. Friedman & Feiger, L.L.P. (David Joachim v. Friedman & Feiger, L.L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 24, 2021
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00694-CV
DAVID JOACHIM, Appellant V. FRIEDMAN & FEIGER, L.L.P., Appellee
On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-13421
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Reichek We reinstate this appeal. In August 2019, we abated this case due to the
suggestion of bankruptcy filed by Joachim. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2.
An independent review of the federal Public Access to Court Electronic
Records (PACER) system shows no pending bankruptcy proceeding associated with
this appeal. We notified the parties by letter dated May 7, 2021, requesting they
inform the Court of the status of this appeal. When no one responded, we then sent
a second letter, dated July 21, 2021, informing the parties that the appeal would be
reinstated and dismissed for want of prosecution within ten days unless we heard
from either party. See id. 42.3(b),(c). To date, no party has responded. Because we gave the parties an opportunity to show why we should not
dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and no one responded, we dismiss this
appeal. See id. 42.3(b), (c); Gibbs v. Bank One, Tex., 2021 WL 1747855, at *1 (Tex.
App.—Dallas May 4, 2021, no pet.) (mem. op.).
/Amanda L. Reichek/ AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE
190694F.P05
–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
DAVID JOACHIM, Appellant On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-19-00694-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-13421. Opinion delivered by Justice FRIEDMAN & FEIGER, L.L.P., Reichek. Justices Schenck and Appellee Carlyle participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
It is ORDERED that appellee FRIEDMAN & FEIGER, L.L.P. recover its costs of this appeal from appellant DAVID JOACHIM.
Judgment entered August 24, 2021
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David Joachim v. Friedman & Feiger, L.L.P., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-joachim-v-friedman-feiger-llp-texapp-2021.