David Jay Houston v. State
This text of David Jay Houston v. State (David Jay Houston v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-99-309-CR
DAVID JAY HOUSTON,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
From the 292nd District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court # F97-02839
DISSENTING OPINION
I agree with most of the majority opinion. However, with regard to his complaint about the lack of a speedy trial, I do not believe that David Jay Houston has made a prima facie showing of prejudice. Further, it does not appear that there was a “serious prejudice beyond that which ensued from the ordinary and inevitable delay,” including the delay to which he agreed. Balancing the required factors to determine if Houston’s right to a speedy trial had been violated, I would hold that his right to a speedy trial had not been violated and affirm the judgment. See Bailey v. State, No. 10-99-132-CR, (Tex. App.—Waco, October 4, 2000, pet. filed).
TOM GRAY
Justice
Dissenting opinion delivered and filed January 17, 2001
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David Jay Houston v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-jay-houston-v-state-texapp-2001.