David James Chapman v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 6, 2015·No. 01-14-00980-CR·Published

Opinion

PPEA -|©ft»t)WrSP1,APPEALS HOUSTON. TEXAS

MAR-6 2015

jk xogm-ify of fornix and cgcn^mf W^sntenQrx). 1 try (ujr&>) qv^ajIUia p£^S r ^ a c s noQ±k££ pfcrg ^-ti;•? ^76 q &SS gM^SSz n/)Me ae tjpu^nn 3gg^§53o56 •fhrii£7. ShoTon o|mn Try to zapA -tlxqS 7 7Q36- rAfijh ^>v ugmiems_ (^p^xjg-, rL nn T>d> rot-mem- stoM^a i nci e. (.a. jVq I 2)_a itO Ee tip, SfTTrhnq i / 'Qyr^e; CK 2H l/Yfr 1/vPtP. -Vfi^n^n ^hglApAV^n QBaQ ore, Q iC^dQ 2_£bU0dS2 m€ nn& YnrilCiVV^Al- ( ft £ zander o>vnd l

UH2n frvQf Son PUrf oy^X^-^iAimfr teS^^IE iMriiCh i Sgp5#£ffiQ£u^

CgaloCoe^X

di> Or spe.\p\6. -imfr wobofring nfr^ rv^ Cafie a piftn, c\

P^ATCjvmenV -Pen irVadTrX) ArfofcST ^ftp^m 92aCP. o^'TCVX V- fcomXeX^ (a iVu'Ch is fro? ^he, CjJlSL i|S^-t-rx-^ed. on DUD (SEB -fiYr&cF \/W\> /\(^C0 c^v TVs i,ii„,T\a "T ^s^Vi? ™^ ^VirvLC gygffijvilfla \a,/Yu(X h^poppgH TnthP rd hV ro-/ Co OeA^ryjoTpr- UjVxi lAtaiS fYJT Cm q^fc S2cx3 i sen? nrni X estcPS bi K rVvA ndV hold , q. \Ajgopdn-to beriAjjaich vfs provjenfn •" Ffyfe Pa 0C£ report a(?y\ 0% jem?nt- sv^ot M £& pecYvrmgM qyv^o u/^-yw -to Court- and gov my Sentflnn? -fe> \e± /he, cSyeaic oo^£naV£ of 4-v^p o>sg or lAfrnti un?> S^.-kt^h Qm^i^o Ux-iAc\ 1£0Corri@yyj .to -tv)p„vSrucy -yn s^YMjocg mexo any

xsstjes fifi^r^eA my im^iwr aVjviM^g 6£ rvst?. ^TOiKfciq. £no5t ~u¥-tYlP, Sfa&gd ±rQ[t OM rr^m- ^£ u/Ti) an augc

gL_not iZfrjacstoaji^yHn^ yp n 1D9 c.i yQp^Jaj 111 laryfc kfiftt REEF Ofb

^>"ri U^rf Cftcr> /y,n(j -to Thp ftftrifyp x^^r x oer. neffiw ^MJ CpXvc^ O ipnyOR- "oZ dr -fri BCI g^S • ..... lAfejV-X e*nft* -Voc ... a Cju: 1 Dd-ed x^fit ei>,n: f^^t^ x 53d ™~ PQU nn -rvot-^np./A/^' r> L]fcto-ftx i/ane^ v/frfosatez. jXfttJ^ Q^dOnP^

1^r;A t. nxi^i ft ^mrpcx # 9^Afy^f^6 ± g£ujQ^g. rmigfi-^bo-tofs ,onrfag£ rn £, CX)Yng. g i b-rgw arsovyvrwpf^r a M u/i-i?((m?" ZbeJSF-uZS5 otody o^rreox jfm^ec^\& trW>t>i lEBEgL ^Crhd^lofa ^ 6 YV. rV(./(We 9stnPeirn Xiat~X jHJIUfr

^afi r6a 3B2m7JIT hat T. 0\ ^iPa.fiOQ nT aVSO 0 rce repo ?Mr^,r m DA JY^P~fYX%Vc£ ; r FUgeM PPF,/\ V

A(btv?.meof-i \ %gg /KXtyafeiCrfgaix^ SMiOLWE^IS 0^4 CifCum^-tgYACgS 04- " Th£ RVTT) c£j in Toeff€(ofP\/e c&jt^p]

by plPa&lY\Cs QlZEJrfA/ -to C% U4iiCD_±D jruAQ^-^axim^har 1, auil£d j-H^u/eaporv (ajwfat cS5E)Z3H&ti-^i-Ul-lM tAjax^oiQ .Oiiti)£-X^_5-a32tpgaL XiT og c\n(W. 2/>* to (!2£JSU^ QfuC) , z

u6lcnrioQ o P £ inoC\aVu/^4v>'oorrcTa 90006^sg SBpZzoB cferry sfar-e _5jg nxf^f dt-:ffaOf:Vna^-r/Ard nirpal 1a iA/&xgnr\ on ^rSo nx; C^prm fe. d Ysrvi rf;^g O £KgMm tn^^AQyv^ oFaTB not k&2porx)) \A££^n& D£4xe Coii&i^im a Agxp_azO£xf^ /& joi& C^ryr^r^^xY^vX of;. --faelPS. ces ^£oQXam...-.-Xx_f^eecx K pfe6at7on vc^yfyi or op. _ a fit c\Tf;n^^f^A, one, Soctha U^

jApffiSl opffivfr. S^HiQtidQ So ^ lAOfr- SVPGX or^ferpl 7aifirii7c^,ti^r^ (AH mm r i PomtQ\ i/t

£a n 35 i fiT_ ..&.

st£jOll TOie mc^y. n- Q'o^ &\j£_Qd2i£

i2h*e XSXr MAR Hfi^a-'ilS U.S. POSTAGE » PITNEY BOV,VES Name; a? SPN:, €3 MAR '15 Street: 1PM .7 iL ZIP 77019 iJffiBu 000137417 9 MAR 03 2015 PXP8T OrstrrCi-CDUfi-of- A?pea5 '-• T ^ l k T"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David James Chapman v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

David James Chapman v. State (David James Chapman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.