David J. Bullock v. Sterling Drug Inc.

Third Circuit

David J. Bullock v. Sterling Drug Inc.

187 F.2d 145

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided February 23, 1951·No. 10350_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff instituted this action to recover a substantial amount of severance pay. The defendant denied that he was an employee within the meaning of its severance pay schedule, and asserted that no enforceable contract existed between them. We have examined the record and find nothing to convince us that the District Court erred in its findings or in the application of well-settled principles of contract law. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court will be affirmed upon its opinion, 93 F.Supp. 371.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff instituted this action to recover a substantial amount of severance pay. The defendant denied that he was an employee within the meaning of its severance pay schedule, and asserted that no enforceable contract existed between them. We have examined the record and find nothing to convince us that the District Court erred in its findings or in the application of well-settled principles of contract law. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court will be affirmed upon its opinion, 93 F.Supp. 371.

David J. Bullock v. Sterling Drug Inc., 187 F.2d 145 (3d Cir. 1951).

Pincite

187 F.2d 145 (David J. Bullock v. Sterling Drug Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related