David J. Bullock v. Sterling Drug Inc.

Third Circuit

David J. Bullock v. Sterling Drug Inc.

187 F.2d 145

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedFebruary 23, 1951

Docket10350_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 187 F.2d 145 (David J. Bullock v. Sterling Drug Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

David J. Bullock v. Sterling Drug Inc., 187 F.2d 145 (3d Cir. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff instituted this action to recover a substantial amount of severance pay. The defendant denied that he was an employee within the meaning of its severance pay schedule, and asserted that no enforceable contract existed between them. We have examined the record and find nothing to convince us that the District Court erred in its findings or in the application of well-settled principles of contract law. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court will be affirmed upon its opinion, 93 F.Supp. 371.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff instituted this action to recover a substantial amount of severance pay. The defendant denied that he was an employee within the meaning of its severance pay schedule, and asserted that no enforceable contract existed between them. We have examined the record and find nothing to convince us that the District Court erred in its findings or in the application of well-settled principles of contract law. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court will be affirmed upon its opinion, 93 F.Supp. 371.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 F.2d 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-j-bullock-v-sterling-drug-inc-ca3-1951.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack