David Ingraham v. the State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 29, 2025·No. 3D2024-1028·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed January 29, 2025.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D24-1028

Lower Tribunal No. F89-12383C

David Ingraham,

Petitioner,

vs.

State of Florida,

Respondent.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Habeas Corpus.

The Law Office of Zirpoli Chase and Lindsay Chase (Hollywood), for petitioner.

John Guard, Acting Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before FERNANDEZ, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM.

Denied. See Pedroza v. State, 291 So. 3d 541 (Fla. 2020); see also Ingraham v. State, 314 So. 3d 715 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David Ingraham v. the State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

David Ingraham v. the State of Florida (David Ingraham v. the State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.