David Ingraham v. the State of Florida
This text of David Ingraham v. the State of Florida (David Ingraham v. the State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed January 29, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-1028 Lower Tribunal No. F89-12383C ________________
David Ingraham, Petitioner,
vs.
State of Florida, Respondent.
A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Habeas Corpus.
The Law Office of Zirpoli Chase and Lindsay Chase (Hollywood), for petitioner.
John Guard, Acting Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Before FERNANDEZ, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Denied. See Pedroza v. State, 291 So. 3d 541 (Fla. 2020); see also
Ingraham v. State, 314 So. 3d 715 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David Ingraham v. the State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-ingraham-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.