David Ignacio Cristan v. the State of Texas
This text of David Ignacio Cristan v. the State of Texas (David Ignacio Cristan v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Return to: First Court of Appeals 301 Fannin Street Houston, Texas 77002
No. 01-___-__________-CR _________________ § COURT OF APPEALS § 1ST DISTRICT The State of Texas § HOUSTON, TEXAS
Pro se Motion for Access to Appellate Record To the Honorable Justices of Said Court: Appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a brief in the above styled and numbered cause pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Appellant now moves this Court to provide him with a copy of the appellate record including the clerk’s record and the court reporter’s record for use in preparing his pro se response to counsel’s brief. Appellant requests an extension of time of 30 days from the granting of this motion to file a pro se response to counsel’s Anders brief. Respectfully submitted,
_______________________ Pro se Appellant _____________ Unit,TDCJ # __________ ____________, Texas _______
Certificate of Service This is to certify that on ____________, a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document was served by mail on the Harris County District Attorney’s Office at 1201 Franklin Street #600, Houston, Texas 77002. _______________________ Pro se Appellant
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David Ignacio Cristan v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-ignacio-cristan-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.