David Henry Hansen v. Terry Ann Hansen
This text of David Henry Hansen v. Terry Ann Hansen (David Henry Hansen v. Terry Ann Hansen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-07-00223-CV
John Koo Hyun Kim, Appellant
v.
United Central Bank and Texas Department of Banking, Appellees
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 250TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-06-004538, HONORABLE LORA J. LIVINGSTON, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant John Koo Hyun Kim filed a notice of appeal, seeking to appeal from the
trial court’s order granting appellee United Central Bank’s motion to transfer venue. We have
reviewed the clerk’s record filed in this cause and because we lack jurisdiction over this interlocutory
appeal, we dismiss the cause for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).
Generally, courts of appeals may exercise jurisdiction of appeals from final orders
or judgments only. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (“A judgment is
final for purposes of appeal if it disposes of all pending parties and claims in the record, except as
necessary to carry out the decree.”). There are certain statutory exceptions to this rule, which
explicitly provide for an interlocutory appeal from a non-final order. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.
Code Ann. § 51.014 (West Supp. 2006) (listing permissible interlocutory appeals). An appeal from
a trial court’s venue determination may not be reviewed by interlocutory appeal. Id. § 15.064(a) (West 2002) (no interlocutory appeal from trial court’s determination of venue); Electronic Data Sys.
Corp. v. Pioneer Elecs. (USA) Inc., 68 S.W.3d 254, 257 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2002, no pet.).
Appellant seeks to appeal from the trial court’s interlocutory order transferring venue
from Travis County to Dallas County. We may not consider this complaint in an interlocutory
appeal. Therefore, we must dismiss this cause for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).
__________________________________________
David Puryear, Justice
Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Henson
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: July 5, 2007
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David Henry Hansen v. Terry Ann Hansen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-henry-hansen-v-terry-ann-hansen-texapp-2007.