David Hawkinson v. Virginia Trzebiatwoski, et al.

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin
DecidedOctober 31, 2025
Docket2:23-cv-00634
StatusUnknown

This text of David Hawkinson v. Virginia Trzebiatwoski, et al. (David Hawkinson v. Virginia Trzebiatwoski, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Wisconsin primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David Hawkinson v. Virginia Trzebiatwoski, et al., (E.D. Wis. 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ______________________________________________________________________________ DAVID HAWKINSON,

Plaintiff, v. Case No. 23-cv-634-pp

VIRGINIA TRZEBIATWOSKI, et al.,

Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER DENYING AS PREMATURE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO HAVE HIS SISTER TAKE OVER CASE (DKT. NO. 38) ______________________________________________________________________________

At the October 27, 2025 telephonic status conference, the plaintiff reminded the court that he has alleged that his heart is failing and that he is very ill. He told the court that some time ago, he had filed some motions asking whether his sister could take over the case if he dies; he stated that he thought the motions were on the docket around Dkt. No. 38. The document that the plaintiff referenced is a “Critically Ill Statement” that he filed on February 8, 2024, in which he said that he hoped the statement would help his sister “hold the Defendants” in this case. Dkt. No. 38 at ¶1. If the plaintiff dies before this case is over, his claims will survive, and they would belong to his estate. See McSwain v. Schrubbe, 382 Fed. App’x 500, 502 (7th Cir. 2010). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1) allows courts to substitute a proper party if an existing party dies while litigation is ongoing. The proper party is “the decedent’s successors (if his estate has been distributed) or a personal representative ([if] it has not been).” Atkins v. City of Chicago, 547 F.3d 869, 873 (7th Cir. 2008). If the plaintiffs sister is the administrator or personal representative of his estate, then under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a), she may file a motion to substitute as plaintiff within 90 days after service of a statement noting the plaintiffs death. The plaintiff should be aware that his sister cannot represent his estate in this lawsuit “without the assistance of a lawyer unless she is ‘the sole beneficiary of the estate.” Mix v. Carr, Case No. 23-cv-826, 2025 WL 1193158, at *1 (W.D. Wis. April 24, 2025) (quoting Malone v. Nielson, 474 F.3d 934, 937 (7th Cir. 2007)). If the plaintiff passes away and the plaintiffs sister files a motion to substitute herself as plaintiff, the court will decide at that time whether she is the proper party. But the court cannot appoint or substitute the plaintiffs sister before the plaintiff dies. To the extent that the plaintiff intended his “Critically Il] Statement” to be a motion asking the court to substitute his sister as plaintiff or to appoint his sister as his personal representative, the court will deny that motion as premature. The court DENIES AS PREMATURE the plaintiffs motion to have sister take over the case. Dkt. No. 38. Dated in Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 31st day of October, 2025. BY THE COURT:

Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atkins Ex Rel. Atkins v. City of Chicago
547 F.3d 869 (Seventh Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
David Hawkinson v. Virginia Trzebiatwoski, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-hawkinson-v-virginia-trzebiatwoski-et-al-wied-2025.