David Harvey Brewster v. Donald E. Bordenkircher, Warden, West Virginia Penitentiary
This text of 767 F.2d 81 (David Harvey Brewster v. Donald E. Bordenkircher, Warden, West Virginia Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judges Winter, Russell, Widener, Hall, Sprouse, Chapman, Wilkinson and Sneeden concur in affirming the judgment of the district court for the reasons expressed by *82 Judge Widener in his dissent to the panel opinion found at 745 F.2d 913, 918 (4th Cir.1984).
Judges Phillips, Murnaghan and Ervin would reverse the judgment of the district court for the reasons expressed by Judge Murnaghan in his opinion for the panel majority found at 745 F.2d 913.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
767 F.2d 81, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 20799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-harvey-brewster-v-donald-e-bordenkircher-warden-west-virginia-ca4-1985.