David Hannah v. Dora Schriro

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
• Decided: December 8, 2000
• Docket: 00-2763
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 00-2763 ___________

David N. Hannah, Jr., * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Dora B. Schriro, Director Missouri * Eastern District of Missouri. Department of Corrections; James A. * Gammon, Superintendent Moberly * [UNPUBLISHED] Correctional Center; Teresa Thornburg, * Assistant Superintendent, Moberly * Correctional Center, * * Appellees. ___________

Submitted: December 4, 2000 Filed: December 8, 2000 ___________

Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate David Hannah appeals the district court’s1 28 U.S.C.

1 The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. § 1915A(b)(1) dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Upon de novo review, see Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam), we agree with the district court that Hannah failed to allege sufficient facts to state a claim, see Wishon v. Gammon, 978 F.2d 446, 450 (8th Cir. 1992) (requirements for equal protection claim); Springdale Educ. Ass’n v. Springdale Sch. Dist., 133 F.3d 649, 651 (8th Cir. 1998) (conclusory allegations insufficient to state claim under § 1983).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-