David Goad v. Jamie Osborne
Opinion
FILED IN
4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 06/3/2015 11:22:16 AM
KEITH E. HOTTLE
Clerk
EXHIBIT A
pr-'.
SMALL CLAIMS
CAUSE N0-
DAVID GOAD § IN THE JUSTICE v.
Plaintiff,
§
COURT
§
JAMIE OSBORNE § PRECINCT NO. FOUR
§
Defendant.
§ § GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS
PARTIES
Plaintiff, David Goad, resides at 154 Rtvertree Drive, Phone no. 830-5 l5-2052 l in New Braunfels, Texas 78130 Defendant, Jamie Osborne, Austin Street, Sequin.
home address is unknown,
Texas 78155. her work address is: 3000 North
COMPLAINT
1. Jamie Osborne, knowingly, deliberately,
recklessly, and with
malice committed
fraudulent and malicious acts between 2012
and June of 2014,
causing financial loss
David Goad (and others) to in the matters
conceming her practices,
appraisal. evaluation,
and reporting methods of the real property located at Zuehl Airfield, more
panicularly
described as property ID: 107520 (1.00
acre, more or less,
out of abstract 134
of the lose
Flores Survey, Guadalupe County,
Texas.) on Windsock
Lane, Marion, Texas.
was
F li.E
- — DI
M’. PRECINCT
#4 SEGUIN
UPE COUNTY. TEXAS
"‘ A.
3. Jamie Osbome’s acts may violate the constitutional righls of David Goad (and
others) under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983.
REQUESTS
5. David Goad moves for the maximum amount allowed by this court
($10,006.00). This amount includes, but is not limited to: actual losses and damages. Plus
all costs incurred.
6. David Goad reserves the right to re-plead all amount(s) he seeks in this case if
this case is otherwise moved, transferred, or appealed to a court with higher limits.
M
Respectfully submitted,
AVID OOAD, Plaintiff pro se 1154 Rivertree Drive New Braunfels. Texas 78130 830—5l5-2052
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
David Goad v. Jamie Osborne (David Goad v. Jamie Osborne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.