David Ghazvini v. Texas Workforce Commission, Anders Alcantar, Julian Alvares, College of the Mainland, Ruth R. Hughes, and Lee College

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 16, 2019
Docket14-19-00413-CV
StatusPublished

This text of David Ghazvini v. Texas Workforce Commission, Anders Alcantar, Julian Alvares, College of the Mainland, Ruth R. Hughes, and Lee College (David Ghazvini v. Texas Workforce Commission, Anders Alcantar, Julian Alvares, College of the Mainland, Ruth R. Hughes, and Lee College) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David Ghazvini v. Texas Workforce Commission, Anders Alcantar, Julian Alvares, College of the Mainland, Ruth R. Hughes, and Lee College, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 16, 2019.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00413-CV

DAVID GHAZVINI, Appellant V. TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION, ANDERS ALCANTAR, JULIAN ALVARES, COLLEGE OF THE MAINLAND, RUTH R. HUGHS, AND LEE COLLEGE, Appellees

On Appeal from the 10th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 18-CV-1058

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an attempted appeal from an order signed by the trial court on January 17, 2019, sustaining the Texas Workforce Commission’s objection to appellant David Ghazvini’s jury demand. Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). When orders do not dispose of all pending parties and claims, the orders remain interlocutory and unappealable until final judgment is rendered, unless a statutory exception applies. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).

On June 11, 2019, notice was sent to the parties of this court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless on or before June 21, 2019, appellant filed a response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant did not file a response.

The appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Spain and Poissant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)
Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson
53 S.W.3d 352 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)
Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps
842 S.W.2d 266 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
David Ghazvini v. Texas Workforce Commission, Anders Alcantar, Julian Alvares, College of the Mainland, Ruth R. Hughes, and Lee College, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-ghazvini-v-texas-workforce-commission-anders-alcantar-julian-texapp-2019.