David Gentry Waller v. State
This text of David Gentry Waller v. State (David Gentry Waller v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-13-00106-CR
DAVID GENTRY WALLER, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 6th District Court Red River County, Texas Trial Court No. CR01897
Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. ORDER Val Varley, counsel for appellee, The State of Texas, has filed a motion to extend time to
file the appellee’s brief. The brief was due January 6, 2014.
In his motion, counsel does not provide the Court with a reasonable explanation of the
need for an extension of time. This Court interprets Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure
10.5(b)(2) as requiring counsel to provide specific information to justify a requested extension,
including the cause numbers of other briefs filed, the dates they were filed, the dates of trials,
how long those trials are expected to last, etc. Broad, general statements do not provide the
required facts and are not adequate to meet the requirements of the Rule. See TEX. R. APP. P.
10.5(b)(2).
All future motions to extend time must contain case-specific information adequate to
justify the request, or they will be denied.
In this instance, we grant the motion and extend the deadline for filing appellee’s brief by
twenty-one days, making appellee’s brief now due January 27, 2014. Further requests for
extensions will not be looked upon with favor.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: January 14, 2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David Gentry Waller v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-gentry-waller-v-state-texapp-2014.