David G. Damron v. Gene A. Scroggy, Warden
This text of 826 F.2d 1062 (David G. Damron v. Gene A. Scroggy, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
826 F.2d 1062
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
David G. DAMRON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Gene A. SCROGGY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 86-6190
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Aug. 11, 1987.
ORDER
Before LIVELY, Chief Judge, KEITH, Circuit Judge, and DOWD, District Judge.*
This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the briefs and record, this panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Petitioner filed this action for federal habeas corpus relief (28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254) contesting the constitutionality of 1985 Kentucky convictions for assault and persistent felony offender. The magistrate to whom the matter was referred recommended dismissing the petition. This recommendation carried the notation that further appeal would be waived if petitioner failed to file timely objections to the recommendation. Petitioner did not file objections with the district court as advised. The court adopted the recommendation and this appeal followed. On appeal the parties have submitted briefs, petitioner proceeding pro se.
Upon consideration, we conclude petitioner's failure to file timely objections to the magistrate's report and recommendation constituted a waiver of further appellate review. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466 (1985). We affirm. Rule 9(b)(4), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
The Honorable David D. Dowd, Jr., U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
826 F.2d 1062, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 10668, 1987 WL 38402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-g-damron-v-gene-a-scroggy-warden-ca6-1987.