David Fox & Sons, Inc. v. Steele

8 Misc. 2d 530, 171 N.Y.S.2d 148, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2029
Nassau County District Court·Decided December 9, 1957·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Edwin ft. Lynde, J.

Motion to dismiss summons for failure to conform to sections 11 and 12 of the Nassau County District Court Act (L. 1955, ch. 736). The summons indicated the street addresses of plaintiff and the office of the clerk of the court, hut failed to indicate the town or village in which such street addresses were located.

An examination of the summons indicates that same is defective in two respects: first, it does not clearly indicate the address of the clerk of the court, and second, the address of the plaintiff is not sufficient to identify his place of residence.

Accordingly, the court did not secure jurisdiction of the matter and the summons is dismissed.

Submit order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David Fox & Sons, Inc. v. Steele, 8 Misc. 2d 530, 171 N.Y.S.2d 148, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2029 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1957).

8 Misc. 2d 530 (David Fox & Sons, Inc. v. Steele) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. Steinberger
2025 NY Slip Op 51690(U) (NYC Civil Court, Kings, 2025)
Malik v. Cukrowski
172 Misc. 2d 360 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1997)