DAVID FONSECA v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA
This text of DAVID FONSECA v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA (DAVID FONSECA v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DAVID FONSECA, Appellant,
v.
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA, Appellee.
No. 4D20-2612
[August 4, 2021]
Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Terri-Ann Miller, Judge; L.T. Case No. COSO20008632.
David Fonseca, Weston, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory [and] [w]ithout knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal.”).
FORST, KLINGENSMITH and ARTAU, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
DAVID FONSECA v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-fonseca-v-first-national-bank-of-omaha-fladistctapp-2021.