David Felton v. State of North Carolina James P. Bailey, United States Magistrate Judge Jerry Clayton H.M. Michaux Durham County Durham City

74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38820, 1996 WL 26761
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 24, 1996
Docket95-7357
StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.3d 1231 (David Felton v. State of North Carolina James P. Bailey, United States Magistrate Judge Jerry Clayton H.M. Michaux Durham County Durham City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David Felton v. State of North Carolina James P. Bailey, United States Magistrate Judge Jerry Clayton H.M. Michaux Durham County Durham City, 74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38820, 1996 WL 26761 (4th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

74 F.3d 1231
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

David FELTON, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
STATE of North Carolina; James P. Bailey, United States
Magistrate Judge; Jerry Clayton; H.M. Michaux;
Durham County; Durham City,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-7357.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 11, 1996
Decided Jan. 24, 1996

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-153-F)

David Felton, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before RUSSELL, HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Felton v. North Carolina, No. CA-93-153-F (E.D.N.C. July 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38820, 1996 WL 26761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-felton-v-state-of-north-carolina-james-p-bai-ca4-1996.