David Felton v. Gary Dixon North Carolina Attorney General

Fourth Circuit

David Felton v. Gary Dixon North Carolina Attorney General

59 F.3d 166, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23394, 1995 WL 376159

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 26, 1995

Docket95-6331

StatusPublished

This text of 59 F.3d 166 (David Felton v. Gary Dixon North Carolina Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

David Felton v. Gary Dixon North Carolina Attorney General, 59 F.3d 166, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23394, 1995 WL 376159 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

59 F.3d 166
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

David FELTON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Gary DIXON; North Carolina Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 95-6331.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 26, 1995.

David Felton, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Norwood League, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Felton v. Dixon, No. CA-94-126-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 30, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*

DISMISSED

*

We deny Appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

59 F.3d 166
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

David FELTON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Gary DIXON; North Carolina Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 95-6331.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 26, 1995.

David Felton, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Norwood League, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Felton v. Dixon, No. CA-94-126-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 30, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*

DISMISSED

*

We deny Appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 F.3d 166, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23394, 1995 WL 376159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-felton-v-gary-dixon-north-carolina-attorney--ca4-1995.