David F. Paquette v. Department of Corrections
This text of 2020 ME 37 (David F. Paquette v. Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2020 ME 37 Docket: Cum-19-403 Submitted On Briefs: February 26, 2020 Decided: March 31, 2020
Panel: MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, HUMPHREY, HORTON, and CONNORS, JJ.
DAVID F. PAQUETTE
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
PER CURIAM
[¶1] Because events in the Superior Court have overtaken this appeal,
we dismiss it as moot.
[¶2] David F. Paquette, an inmate in the custody of the Maine
Department of Corrections, filed an action in the Superior Court (Cumberland
County) against the Department. The court (Warren, J.) treated the action as a
petition for review of agency action. See 5 M.R.S. §§ 11001-11008 (2018);
M.R. Civ. P. 80C. After the court issued an order requiring Paquette to show
cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for failure to serve the
Department pursuant to 5 M.R.S. § 11003(1), Paquette filed documents
showing unsuccessful attempts to serve the Attorney General but not the
Department itself. 2
[¶3] The court dismissed Paquette’s petition for insufficient service of
process. Paquette then filed a document making additional assertions
regarding his service efforts. The court treated that filing as an appeal.
[¶4] After the appeal was docketed in the Law Court, Paquette filed in
the trial court a motion to serve the Department by mail and documents
asserting that the Department had acknowledged receipt of process. We
entered an order that suspended M.R. App. P. 3(b) to permit the court to act
on Paquette’s assertions. The court revisited the service issue and granted
Paquette leave to effect alternate service. See M.R. Civ. P. 4(g).
[¶5] The court has thus negated its dismissal of Paquette’s petition,
rendering this appeal moot. Cf. E. Me. Med. Ctr. v. Me. Health Care Fin. Comm’n,
601 A.2d 99, 101 (Me. 1992).
The entry is:
Appeal dismissed. Remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
David F. Paquette, appellant pro se
Aaron M. Frey, Attorney General, and Jillian R. O’Brien, Asst. Atty. Gen., Office of the Attorney General, Augusta, for appellee Department of Corrections
Cumberland County Superior Court docket number CV-2018-510 FOR CLERK REFERENCE ONLY
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2020 ME 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-f-paquette-v-department-of-corrections-me-2020.